In finance, AI assistants answer questions about money that people will act on: choosing a bank or a broker, checking whether an investment firm is authorised, understanding a tax or pension rule. Because a wrong answer can cost savings, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and Perplexity lean first on regulators, public authorities and established institutions, and only then on brand sites, reviews and communities.

3'750
AI answers in this industry
amf-france.org
most cited domain (4.96 per 100 answers)
Wikipedia
most cited platform (1.07 per 100 answers)

Key takeaways

  • Government websites take 10% of the top-20 citations in Finance, against 19% for the panel as a whole.

Summarize this page with ChatGPTClaudePerplexity

What changed in September 2026

  • Answers analyzed 1'275 (= 0% vs August 2026)
  • First domain amf-france.org (8.16 per 100 answers), replacing banque-france.fr
  • First platform LinkedIn (1.18 per 100 answers)

Months compared: September 2026 and August 2026.

Biggest movers in September 2026

No platform reached 30 citations in August 2026 or September 2026 here: a month-over-month change would rest on too few citations, so none is shown.

Most cited domains in AI answers, Finance

None of the 10 most cited domains in Finance (amf-france.org, eex.com, myfid.be...) appears among the 50 most cited domains of the whole panel.

How to read it: each bar is a domain; its length is its number of citations per 100 answers over the selected period and filters.

Domains ranked by citations per 100 answers, all periods combined.

RankRank changeDomainCitationsper 100 answersShare of citations12 months
1Up 4
amf-france.org +1 subdomain
  • amf-france.org 154
  • protectepargne.amf-france.org 32
1864.961.17%Trend: 2.75 in Jul 2026, 8.16 in Sep 2026, high 8.16.
2Down 2eex.com1834.881.15%Trend: 6.58 in Jul 2026, 4.08 in Sep 2026, high 6.58.
3Down 2myfid.be1784.751.12%Trend: 4.00 in Jul 2026, 4.71 in Sep 2026, high 5.49.
4Down 2
banque-france.fr +1 subdomain
  • banque-france.fr 96
  • acpr.banque-france.fr 72
1684.481.05%Trend: 7.22 in Aug 2026, 5.96 in Sep 2026, high 7.22.
5Up 1itaa.be1674.451.05%Trend: 2.58 in Jul 2026, 6.43 in Sep 2026, high 6.43.
6Down 2ice.com1423.790.89%Trend: 4.58 in Jul 2026, 3.22 in Sep 2026, high 4.58.
7out of topubs.com1122.990.70%Trend: 5.83 in Jul 2026, 3.29 in Aug 2026, high 5.83.
8out of topsfbvg.ch1062.830.67%Trend: 5.83 in Jul 2026, 2.82 in Aug 2026, high 5.83.
9out of toptopstep.com962.560.60%Trend: 4.67 in Jul 2026, 3.14 in Aug 2026, high 4.67.
10out of topaeis.ch922.450.58%Trend: 5.33 in Jul 2026, 2.20 in Aug 2026, high 5.33.
11Up 19economie.gouv.fr842.240.53%Trend: 2.04 in Aug 2026, 4.55 in Sep 2026, high 4.55.
12Up 6sage.com822.190.51%Trend: 2.43 in Aug 2026, 4.00 in Sep 2026, high 4.00.
13out of topswisslife.ch812.160.51%Trend: 4.33 in Jul 2026, 2.27 in Aug 2026, high 4.33.
14out of topch.ch731.950.46%Trend: 3.83 in Jul 2026, 2.12 in Aug 2026, high 3.83.
15Up 1bufiscom.be711.890.45%Trend: 2.75 in Aug 2026, 2.82 in Sep 2026, high 2.82.
16newclimate.ec.europa.eu671.790.42%Trend: 2.42 in Jul 2026, 2.98 in Sep 2026, high 2.98.
17Up 6getdefacto.com671.790.42%Trend: 2.27 in Aug 2026, 2.98 in Sep 2026, high 2.98.
18Unchangedbpifrance-creation.fr621.650.39%Trend: 2.27 in Aug 2026, 2.59 in Sep 2026, high 2.59.
19out of topbsv.admin.ch601.600.38%Trend: 2.83 in Jul 2026, 2.04 in Aug 2026, high 2.83.
20Down 5accountable.eu531.410.33%Trend: 2.20 in Aug 2026, 1.96 in Sep 2026, high 2.20.

Rankings are rebuilt from monthly rankings: the counts at the end of a list can be minimums. Industry: the business of the analyzed website, classified by Sorank. Data since July 2026. Rank change: rank in the September 2026 monthly list against August 2026 (new: absent from the August 2026 list). A dash: fewer than 1'000 answers in one of the two months in this scope, or absent from the September 2026 list. 12 months: monthly rate per 100 answers; gaps when the domain is out of the monthly list, hollow points for months under 1'000 answers.

Most cited platforms in AI answers, Finance

Wikipedia is the platform AI cites most in Finance: 1.07 citations per 100 answers, 1.2 times its rate across all sectors over the same months (0.87).

How to read it: each bar is one of the tracked platforms; its length is its number of citations per 100 answers over the selected period.

RankRank changePlatformper 100 answers12 months
1out of topWikipedia1.07Trend: 1.17 in Jul 2026, 0.00 in Sep 2026, high 2.04.
2UnchangedTrustpilot0.88Trend: 0.75 in Jul 2026, 0.94 in Sep 2026, high 0.94.
3Up 3LinkedIn0.67Trend: 0.42 in Jul 2026, 1.18 in Sep 2026, high 1.18.
4Down 2YouTube0.64Trend: 1.25 in Jul 2026, 0.16 in Sep 2026, high 1.25.
5Up 2Reddit0.51Trend: 1.00 in Jul 2026, 0.39 in Sep 2026, high 1.00.
6Up 4Microsoft0.19Trend: 0.08 in Jul 2026, 0.39 in Sep 2026, high 0.39.
7newFacebook0.08Trend: 0.17 in Jul 2026, 0.08 in Sep 2026, high 0.17.
8out of topApple0.05Trend: 0.00 in Jul 2026, 0.00 in Sep 2026, high 0.16.
9newQuora0.03Trend: 0.00 in Jul 2026, 0.08 in Sep 2026, high 0.08.
10No comparisonMedium0.03Trend: 0.08 in Jul 2026, 0.00 in Sep 2026, high 0.08.

Rank change: rank among the platforms cited in September 2026 against August 2026 (new: not cited in August 2026). A dash: fewer than 1'000 answers in one of the two months in this scope, or not cited in September 2026. 12 months: monthly rate per 100 answers, hollow points for months under 1'000 answers.

AI models compared

AI assistants do not agree on the first source in Finance: ChatGPT cites banque-france.fr first; Gemini and Perplexity cite myfid.be first.

How to read it: left, how the citations split between the five models; right, each model's citations per 100 answers, month by month.

Share of citations
Monthly evolution

First source of each AI model in Finance

ModelFirst sourceper 100 answersSecond source
ChatGPT
banque-france.fr +1 subdomain
  • banque-france.fr 98
  • acpr.banque-france.fr 53
12.08
amf-france.org +1 subdomain
  • amf-france.org 73
  • protectepargne.amf-france.org 28
Geminimyfid.be8.32itaa.be
Perplexitymyfid.be4.49bufiscom.be

What do people ask AI assistants about financial companies?

The Finance category covers businesses that sell financial products or services: banks, brokers and trading platforms, wealth and pension managers, payment and invoicing fintechs, accounting firms and treasury software publishers. The questions that reach AI assistants about them fall into a few recurring intents.

  • Choosing a provider: “best online broker for beginners”, “which accounting firm for a small company in Brussels”, “cash management software for a mid-sized group”.
  • Checking legitimacy: “is this trading platform regulated”, “is this firm authorised by the AMF”, “is this investment a scam”.
  • Understanding a rule: “how does occupational pension work in Switzerland”, “what is factoring”, “how are crypto gains taxed in France”.
  • Comparing costs: account fees, trading spreads, interest rates, software subscriptions.

Each intent pulls a different kind of source. Legitimacy and rule questions are answered from official pages, while provider and cost questions open the door to brand sites, comparison pages and customer reviews.

Which sources do AI models trust on financial topics?

Finance belongs to what the search industry calls YMYL topics (“Your Money or Your Life”): content that can change someone’s financial situation. AI models tend to apply the same caution and favour sources whose authority is hard to dispute.

  • Regulators and central banks, such as the AMF and the Banque de France in France, the FCA in the United Kingdom or FINMA in Switzerland. Their registers and warning lists are the natural answer to “is this firm authorised”.
  • Government and tax portals, for taxation, retirement savings and company creation.
  • Professional bodies and official registers, for example the ORIAS register of intermediaries in France or national institutes of accountants and tax advisers.
  • Market infrastructure and large institutions: exchanges, major banks and established software vendors, often cited for definitions and market mechanics such as carbon allowances or derivatives.
  • Platforms: Wikipedia for definitions, Trustpilot for customer experience, LinkedIn for company and expert profiles, Reddit and YouTube for retail traders and personal finance discussions.

What this means for a bank, a fintech or an accounting firm

A financial brand rarely replaces the regulator in an AI answer, and it should not try to. The realistic goal is to appear next to the official source: the authority states the rule, and your page explains how it applies to a given customer situation.

In GEO (Generative Engine Optimization, the work of getting a brand cited in AI-generated answers), trust signals weigh more in finance than in most industries. A model that recommends a broker or a lender risks giving a harmful answer, so it looks for facts it can repeat safely: a licence number, a supervising authority, named experts, clear fee schedules. Pages that state these facts plainly are easier to cite than marketing pages that hide them.

Specialised niches remain open. Questions on treasury management, factoring, carbon markets or occupational pensions draw on a small pool of detailed explainers, and a well-sourced guide written by a specialist can become one of them.

GEO actions for financial companies

  1. Publish your regulatory status on a dedicated page: supervising authority, licence or registration number, legal entity and registered address, written as text rather than inside an image.
  2. Answer the rule questions your customers ask, one page per question (tax treatment, withdrawal conditions, fees), and cite the official text or regulator page behind each answer.
  3. Sign expert content with real people: name, role, qualifications and a matching LinkedIn profile, so models can attach the explanation to a credible author.
  4. Put fees, rates and limits in a plain HTML table with an update date; a model quotes a readable table far more easily than a PDF brochure.
  5. Collect reviews on Trustpilot and answer complaints publicly with facts, since questions such as “is this broker reliable” are often answered from review platforms.
  6. Track which prompts mention your brand and which sources are cited instead, for example with an AI mention tracker such as Sorank, then write the pages that fill those gaps.

Frequently asked questions

Why do AI assistants cite regulators instead of banks when I ask about investments?

Because investment questions carry financial risk, models favour sources whose authority is beyond doubt. A regulator such as the AMF, the FCA or FINMA publishes the rules and the lists of authorised or blacklisted firms, so citing it protects the answer. Banks and brokers still appear, usually for product details, fees or account opening steps, once the official framework has been set out.

Can an AI assistant tell me whether a trading platform is legitimate?

It can point you to the right checks, but the official register remains the reference. Ask which authority supervises the platform in your country, then look the firm up yourself in that regulator’s register and warning list. AI answers can be out of date or confuse companies with similar names, so treat them as a starting point, never as financial advice.

How can a fintech appear in ChatGPT or Perplexity answers?

By publishing pages that answer precise customer questions and carry verifiable trust signals. State your licence and supervisor, explain fees in plain text, sign content with named experts and cite official sources. Perplexity and ChatGPT search retrieve pages from the live web, so a clear, crawlable page can be cited soon after publication, while a presence in training data takes much longer to build.

Do customer reviews matter for financial brands in AI answers?

Yes, mainly for reputation questions. When users ask whether a bank, a broker or an accounting firm is reliable, assistants often summarise review platforms such as Trustpilot alongside regulatory information. A steady flow of recent reviews and factual public replies to complaints give the model a balanced picture to report.

Which websites do AI assistants cite for Finance businesses?

amf-france.org (4.96 citations per 100 answers), eex.com (4.88) and myfid.be (4.75), across 3'750 answers from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and Perplexity about Finance businesses since July 2026.

Which platforms do AI assistants cite in Finance?

Wikipedia (1.07 citations per 100 answers), Trustpilot (0.88) and LinkedIn (0.67).

Method and sources

387'471 answers from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and Perplexity, from August 2025 to September 2026, to the questions Sorank asks every week to follow its clients' visibility (88% of them in French). A citation is a source domain given in an answer; the rate is the number of citations per 100 answers. Data snapshot of 2 October 2026.

Full methodology · Raw data (JSON)

How to cite this page: Sorank Data, “Websites AI cites most in Finance (September 2026)”, data.sorank.com, data snapshot of 2 October 2026.

Track the citations of your own site with Sorank's AI mention tracking.

Finance: get your business cited by AI

Sorank generates SEO-optimized articles and earns high-authority backlinks to rank your website on Google and in AI answers.

+5'000 users
Try for Free